Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or LASIK, has long been one of the most popular surgical solutions for vision correction. But it’s not the only option. In fact, for many people, LASIK may not be the most suitable path to clearer vision due to factors such as corneal thickness, prescription strength, dry eye risk, or simply personal preference.

Fortunately, several other effective and proven alternatives exist, including Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL), Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE), and of course, contact lenses or eyeglasses. Each of these alternatives has unique advantages and disadvantages. Understanding how they compare can help you make the best choice for your eyes, lifestyle, and long-term health.

Beauty routines are often framed as acts of self-care, confidence-building, or simple daily ritual. But what if the very products we trust to care for our skin, hair, and appearance are putting our health at risk? A new study reveals that many women—particularly Black and Latina women—are regularly using personal-care products that contain formaldehyde, a known cancer-causing chemical.

The research, published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, offers a sobering look at how common and widespread toxic ingredients are in beauty and hygiene products—and how these exposures intersect with long-standing beauty standards, systemic inequality, and lax regulations in the U.S. cosmetics industry.

Artificial sweeteners have long been marketed as a healthier alternative to sugar, helping individuals cut calories and manage weight. However, a growing body of research suggests that certain sugar substitutes, particularly sucralose, may have unintended effects—potentially increasing appetite instead of reducing it. A recent study sheds new light on this phenomenon, explaining why sucralose might be counterproductive for those looking to control their weight.